Popular Reviews
There's a specific pattern that spin-off games from major Nintendo franchises follow, and Splatoon Raiders was widely expected to fit that pattern before it launched.
The pattern goes like this: Nintendo announces a spin-off of a beloved franchise. The specific game format sounds like a lesser cousin of the mainline series. Fans get worried. The game launches at a lower price point ($49.99 instead of $59.99 or $69.99) reinforcing the "lesser" framing. Reviews are mixed. The game sells modestly. Nintendo continues focusing on the mainline entries.
Splatoon Raiders was tracking exactly this trajectory in pre-release discussion. Announced June 10, 2025 as a Switch 2 exclusive spin-off. Positioned as single-player-focused, which felt like a compromise for a franchise that had spent 11 years and 30+ million copies sold on competitive multiplayer. Priced at $49.99 — the "spin-off" tier that signals "smaller game."
I want to argue directly that this framing has been wrong. Splatoon Raiders is not a lesser cousin of the mainline series. It's the boldest structural experiment the Splatoon franchise has attempted in its entire history, and the specific pleasures it offers are meaningfully different from — and arguably deeper than — what Splatoon 3's competitive multiplayer provides.
Let me explain why the reflexive skepticism about "Nintendo spin-off" got this one wrong.
What Splatoon Raiders Actually Is
Splatoon Raiders is a third-person PvE looter-shooter. That's the accurate genre framing. Nintendo has never made a game in this specific genre before. Not with Mario. Not with Zelda. Not with Metroid. This is a first for their entire portfolio.
The specific gameplay loop:
You play a customizable character called the Mechanic. You crash-land on the Spirhalite Islands after a bus accident (yes, a bus accident — this is the specific narrative frame). The Deep Cut trio from Splatoon 3 (Frye, Shiver, Big Man) accompany you as characters rather than just idols on stage.
Combat happens across procedurally-arranged maps against wave-based enemy encounters called Salmonids. You use variants of Splatoon's signature ink-based weapons, plus new mechanical gadgets (Shot Pot stationary turret, Splatchet melee weapon, Splatellites area-effect projectiles).
Loot drops from enemies and encounters. Different classes of ink tanks provide different roles. Progressive gear improvements matter over long-term play. Persistent loot progression is not something Splatoon has ever attempted before.
Difficulty scales dynamically. Playing solo, the game adjusts encounter intensity down. Playing with up to 3 additional co-op players (local or online), difficulty adjusts upward. This is Nintendo's specific solution to the co-op scaling problem that many other games handle poorly.
Amiibo integration unlocks specific outfit variants across the game's cosmetic pool. This is a returning Nintendo pattern that some players love and others resent.
The Deep Cut Framing, Which Actually Matters
Splatoon 3 introduced Deep Cut as a trio of hosts for the game's Splatfest events. Frye, Shiver, and Big Man appeared as musical entertainers who introduced content but never had significant playable presence.
Splatoon Raiders makes Deep Cut central playable characters. They're your companions. They have personalities that develop across the campaign. They have specific abilities that complement your Mechanic character in combat.
This matters because it's Nintendo taking previously-established world elements and expanding them meaningfully. Splatoon's world-building has been rich but constrained by the mainline series' focus on competitive multiplayer. Raiders uses the spin-off format to actually explore the fictional universe Nintendo has been building.
Daily comics released through the Nintendo Today app extend the narrative beyond the game itself. This is unusual multi-platform storytelling for Nintendo, whose franchises typically stay contained to their own games.
Compared to the Mainline Splatoon Series
Splatoon 3 (and its predecessors) are competitive multiplayer games where the primary loop is 4v4 Turf War and various ranked modes. Single-player exists as tutorial content and expanded through the Octo Expansion DLC.
Splatoon Raiders flips this. Single-player campaign is the primary content. Multiplayer exists as co-op that supports the campaign rather than as competitive matchmaking.
The specific reasons this design decision matters:
Competitive multiplayer inherently has a shelf life. Players who fall out of the competitive scene lose access to what made the game engaging. Splatoon 3 will eventually shut down its servers and become largely unplayable. That's the fate of every competitive multiplayer game.
Single-player content persists. Splatoon Raiders in 2036 will be exactly as playable as Splatoon Raiders in 2026. The specific pleasure it offers isn't dependent on active player base or server infrastructure.
This is a legitimate reason to prefer the spin-off format for long-term investment. If you want a Splatoon game you can return to a decade from now, Raiders is the choice.
The First-Ever Precedents
Splatoon Raiders establishes multiple first-evers for the franchise:
First single-player-focused entry. Every previous Splatoon game centered multiplayer with single-player as extra content. Raiders reverses this.
First HDR-supported Splatoon game. Switch 2's High Dynamic Range output makes Raiders visually distinct from the three mainline games, none of which use HDR.
First Splatoon PvE looter-shooter. The whole genre positioning is new for the franchise.
First Splatoon spin-off, period. 11 years and no spin-offs until this one.
Each of these firsts represents a deliberate design experiment. Nintendo could have made Splatoon 4 with more of the same competitive multiplayer content. They chose to make something meaningfully different instead. That choice deserves acknowledgment.
Nintendo could have made Splatoon 4 with more of the same competitive multiplayer content. They chose to make something meaningfully different instead.
The Class System, Which Adds Genuine Depth
Splatoon Raiders introduces three ink tank classes that fundamentally reshape combat approach:
Each class has different ink capacity, different weapon compatibility, and different specialization. Choosing a class is a real strategic decision that affects how you engage with encounters.
Combined with weapon variety across ink-based and mechanical categories, the class system gives Raiders genuinely tactical combat that mainline Splatoon didn't need to develop because its competitive structure worked differently.
Loot drops that meaningfully affect stats add long-term progression on top of the class system. Building specific gear loadouts for specific encounter types becomes a real strategic layer.
The No-Difficulty-Penalty Design
One specific design decision deserves attention: Splatoon Raiders explicitly does not penalize you for playing on easier difficulty settings.
Rewards, loot drops, and progression all function equally regardless of difficulty level. Nintendo has stated this is deliberate — they want players to choose the difficulty that produces the most enjoyable experience for them, not the difficulty that maximizes progression rate.
This is a mature design philosophy that many games get wrong. Difficulty systems that penalize easier play essentially force players into stress states they don't enjoy. Raiders' explicit rejection of that pattern is worth acknowledging.
Where Splatoon Raiders Falls Short
Let me be honest about limitations.
The main campaign runtime is modest. Roughly 20-30 hours for a completionist first playthrough. Some players wanted more sprawling content.
The level-up system has confused players. Nintendo has flagged that many players are misinterpreting how progression works, and it's not a bug — the design is unusual and takes adjustment.
Co-op requires Nintendo Switch Online subscription. Single-player doesn't, but the cooperative mode requires the paid Nintendo service.
Switch 2 exclusivity limits reach. Players without Switch 2 (which launched in 2025) cannot play. This is a legitimate barrier for many players.
Amiibo integration means specific cosmetic content is locked behind physical figure purchases. Not required for gameplay, but completionists face additional purchase pressure.
The Salmonid enemy roster feels smaller than dedicated looter-shooters offer. Compared to Destiny 2 or Warframe, enemy variety is meaningful but not exhaustive.
Some players who came for Splatoon competitive multiplayer will feel disconnected. The specific pleasures of Turf War don't transfer to PvE encounters. If competitive was your entire reason for engaging with Splatoon, Raiders won't scratch that itch.
The Amiibo Question
Nintendo continues its long-standing pattern of releasing specific-game amiibo figures that unlock cosmetic content. Splatoon Raiders launched with new Deep Cut amiibo variants that unlock specific outfits.
For players who don't collect amiibo, this is optional cosmetic content that doesn't affect gameplay. For players who collect amiibo, this is another set of purchases to consider.
Nintendo has been criticized for this monetization pattern for years. Whether Raiders' amiibo integration is acceptable depends entirely on your existing relationship with Nintendo's amiibo strategy.
Should You Buy?
Buy Splatoon Raiders if: you own a Nintendo Switch 2, you enjoy PvE looter-shooters, you want a Splatoon game with lasting content that doesn't depend on active servers, or you specifically want to see Deep Cut as playable characters.
Don't buy Splatoon Raiders if: you don't own Switch 2 (the game is exclusive), you specifically want Splatoon competitive multiplayer, or you've never enjoyed the Splatoon franchise (Raiders won't convert you).
At $49.99 digital or $59.99 physical, Splatoon Raiders is priced below Nintendo's typical mainline release tier. This is appropriate for what the game offers — meaningful content but not the same scope as Splatoon 3.
The genuine achievement here is that Nintendo took a beloved competitive franchise and successfully expanded it into an entirely new genre. That's harder than it sounds. Nintendo has attempted this with other franchises (Zelda: Hyrule Warriors comes to mind) with mixed results. Raiders is one of their more successful spin-off experiments.
For the specific audience — Splatoon fans who wanted more from the world beyond competitive multiplayer, PvE looter-shooter fans looking for a colorful alternative to the Destiny/Warframe register, Switch 2 owners looking for a summer 2026 release — Raiders is an easy recommendation. The initial skepticism about "Nintendo spin-off" as a category was wrong in this specific case. Raiders is bolder than it looked in pre-release marketing, and more successful at being bold than its reception has fully acknowledged.